The outbreak of swine influenza virus (SIV) has gained so much attention and publicity recently by different health organisations, governments of many nations, as well as safety experts around the world with the aim to avert the spread of the disease among pigs and ultimately to avoid human to human infection. The symptoms of the SIV includes headache, tiredness, chills, aching muscles, limb or joint pain, diarrhea or stomach upset, sore throat, runny nose, sneezing, and loss of appetite. The presence of the flu has however been reported in Mexico, Canada, Mid-western United States, South America, Europe, Kenya, Mainland China, Taiwan, Japan, parts of eastern Asia, to mention a few . But so far there are no reported cases of swine flu (H1N1) in Nigeria to date.
The history of swine flu was scientifically traced to 1918, when swine influenza was first
proposed to be a disease related to human influenza during the 1918 flu pandemic, when pigs became sick at the same time as humans. The first identification of an influenza virus as a cause of disease in pigs occurred about ten years later, in 1930. For the following 60 years, swine influenza strains were almost exclusively H1N1. Then, between 1997 and 2002, new strains of three different subtypes and five different genotypes emerged as causes of influenza among pigs in North America. In 1997-1998, H3N2 strains emerged. These strains, which include genes derived by reassortment from human, swine and avian viruses, have become a major cause of swine influenza in North America. Reassortment between H1N1 and H3N2 produced H1N1. In 1999 in Canada, a strain of H4N6 crossed the species barrier from birds to pigs, but was contained on a single farm.
The H1N1 form of swine flu is one of the descendants of the strain that caused the 1918 flu pandemic. As well as persisting in pigs, the descendants of the 1918 virus have also circulated in humans through the 20th century, contributing to the normal seasonal epidemics of influenza. However, direct transmission from pigs to humans is rare, with only 12 cases in the U.S. since 2005. Although World Health Organization in its recent statistics said there are 1,893 reported cases in 23 countries. Nevertheless, the retention of influenza strains in pigs after these strains have disappeared from the human population might make pigs a reservoir where influenza viruses could persist, later emerging to reinfect humans once human immunity to these strains has waned.
Meanwhile some Nigerian stakeholders in the agriculture sector have however reacted to this serious issue, one of them is the former deputy governor of Ogun State Mr. Gbenga Kaka, who has now found solace in farming. He declined the campaigns made by the Federal Government of Nigeria regarding the Swine Flu virus, avian influenza virus and other major diseases during the interview he granted a local TV station LTV8 (6th of May 2009).
He said government should go beyond mere propaganda and ensures that all research institutes in Nigeria are well funded and equipped with cutting edge facilities so as to curtail this deadly diseases ravaging the birds and livestock. He expressed dissatisfaction over the propaganda pointing that it has created anxiety in people making them to eschew the consumption of pork, chickens and eggs and according to him that has largely discouraged people from investing in poultry farming. He berated the government of the day who canvasses for self employment but has failed to create an enabling environment for what it is advocating.
Without mincing of words a number of investors in the agricultural sector who took bank loans have ran into serious financial crises as a result of the propaganda and lack of information management on the part of Nigerian government.
It is no news that without farming there won’t be food for the sustenance of growth and the general wellbeing of the people both young and old. Nigerian government should show more commitment and seriousness rather than working on speculations, or relying on the efforts of other country’s research/reports on health related issues.
Nigerian health ministry is giving so much lips service about the swine flu pandemic, but it is embarrassing to know that there are several other diseases which is claiming lives or leading to deformities in both children and adults. Meningitis, malaria, hepatitis, polio etc are still diseases screaming for medical attention in Nigeria.
The efforts of the Federal Airport Authority of Nigeria should be deeply commended (FAAN) through its consultant in respect of their preparedness plan to contain this and other communicable diseases in Murtala Muhammed airport both local and international wing, but I urge them to get all the necessary apparatus/devices to aid this initiative as soon as possible; the seaports are equally expected to act accordingly. President Umaru Yar’Adua has tried meritoriously in his own beat and the ministry of health should not use its own laxity to discredit the image of his administration.
Friday, May 8, 2009
Monday, May 4, 2009
Halliburton bribery scandal: Who are the bribe takers?
By Emmanuel Ajibulu
The Halliburton bribery tale has been a worrisome issue since it broke in 2003, following an investigation of KBR, a Halliburton subsidiary, over payments to a range of high profile Nigerian officials in the executive, NNPC and the NLNG. The sum of $180 million was involved over a contract estimated to worth about $6 billion. Kellog, Brown and Root (KBR), the Halliburton subsidiary that got the job, was part of a four-company joint venture on the project. The company has already pleaded guilty and agreed to pay a fine of $520 million.
In the information available in the public domain, court documents in the USA, KBR admitted that at the crucial junctures before the award of the contracts, KBR’s former CEO, Albert Jack Stanley and others met with three successive former holders of a top-level office in the executive branch of the Nigerian government to ask the office holders to designate a representative with whom the joint-venture should negotiate bribes to Nigerian officials. Two representatives were accordingly hired - a consulting company, Tri-Star, based in Gribraltar and a trading company based in Tokyo. Tri-Star was paid $132 million, while the Tokyo Company got $50 million. All the money was to be passed to Nigerian officials, according to documents on the website of the US Justice Department.
The EFCC, which once probed the $180m bribe scandal, interrogated Edmund Daokuru, former minister of state and Funso Kupolokun, the managing director of the NNPC. The scandal broke out after a French court investigated KBR on an allegation that it paid $180m to FG officials to win contracts for the construction of the NLNG plant (an awesome project aimed at building first Africa’s liquefied natural gas plant in Bony, Rivers State, Nigeria). The House of Representatives also carried out a separate investigation. But Halliburton officials failed to cooperate in unveiling the Nigerian officials who shared the $180 million bribe money, on the excuse that investigation on the same match were afoot in the US and Europe. The bribe paid to Nigerian officials was done at different times, starting from the General Sani Abacha years, in 1995.
In 1995, unconfirmed report revealed that Halliburton’s subsidiary, TSKJ, hired Spanish-based Tri-Star Company, owned by indicted London lawyer, Jeffrey Tessler, to pay $60 million in bribes to Nigerians. In 1999, $37.5 million was paid. It was not clear if the money was paid before Abdulsalami handed over to General Obasanjo in May, 1999. But under Obasanjo, Halliburton twice paid kickbacks– in 2001 and 2002. In 2001, $51 million was paid and in 2002, $37.5 million was paid. Two Nigerians whose names had featured in the bribe saga were Alhaji M.D. Yusuf and former oil minister, Dan Etete, during Abacha’s time. Yusuf admitted collecting money from Tessler, but said it was a loan. Etete, on his part, said the NLNG contract was awarded without his input. The contract was valued at more than $6 billion and awarded between 1995 and 2004.
Meanwhile Former President Olusegun Obasanjo an elder statesman was invited to BBC famous programme Hardtalk (sometime in march 2009), anchored by Steven Suckur. In the middle of the interview Steven said Obasanjo’s name was mentioned by Tesler to have been involved in the drama but Obasanjo distanced himself from any wrong doing. Meanwhile, the American investigators made it known that three former Nigerian leaders were indicted in this shoddy deal, and names like Chief Olusegun Obasanjo, Abdusalami Abubakar and late General Sani Abacha are not spared. Also enmeshed in the vast and formalized bribery scheme is a long line of ministers, bureaucrats, top politicians, state and local officials. The question now is who actually collected this bribe? Nigerians are desperate to know. Or could it be a hoax?
However, in April 2009 some sign of relief came when the Federal Government through the Attorney-General/Minister of Justice, Chief Mike Aondoaka disclosed that $150 million out of the $180 million Halliburton bribe is trapped in Zurich, Switzerland. The minister must indeed be commended for this bold step.
His words: “We have discovered that $150million of the bribe money is in Zurich. That is the first shocking discovery. The entire money is $180 million. $150 million is already in Zurich trapped.”
The Attorney-General while addressing press conference said government was trying to find out in whose account the money was lodged. When asked how he got to know that the money was in Zurich, he replied, “Am I not the chief law officer of this country? I went to US and we had useful information. For me even if you are talking to me, sharing ideas with me I must have all the information authenticated by the government and the US government has been very friendly to us.”
On how the government would treat those indicted, he said, “when crime is committed we prosecute and we would not deny prosecution to anybody.” Aondoaka said he was not happy with the way the Halliburton story was being reported as if the government was hiding the names of those involved.
According to him, “the judgment is under seal and you (press) are talking as if we sealed the names in the court so you can’t get the names. “All these names you get, let me make it clear to you, government does not prosecute out of the newspaper stories.
“If somebody said I voted $40 million for you and if the money does not reach you, can I come and prosecute you because in his book he wrote $40 million?
“There must be evidence that must be tendered to show that that money was handed over to you. Is it through wire transfer? Is it through somebody? So these are some of the things we want to establish. The main fact that somebody wrote in his book that I have voted $40 million that he wants to bribe you does not mean that you have taken bribe... For instance, we have discovered that $150 million of the bribe money is in Zurich. That is the first shocking discovery.”
Consequently, Nigerians are happy with the high powered committee set up specifically to thoroughly investigate this matter, and Nigerians have strong conviction that this committee which involves the EFCC boss Hajia Farida Waziri, the Inspector General of Police Mr. Mike Okiro, Attorney-General Chief Mike Aondoaka, others are representatives of the National Security Adviser (NSA), the Director General of the National Intelligence Agency (NIA) and the Director General, States Security Services (SSS). President Umaru Yar'Adua has given assurance that his administration will not shield any Nigerian, no matter his/her status. The President also called for patience from Nigerians on the issue, saying his administration is waiting for the “authentic” facts, as currently sealed by a US Court, so those involved in the scandal would not turn around to accuse the government of political persecution.
Meanwhile all stakeholders concerned in this investigative task should note that there is something crucial here that should not be undermined, and that is the image of Nigeria. Nigerians have read different reports, so many publication online reports from different websites nationally and internationally therefore the committee should ambidextrously expedite its efforts to ensure that no stone is left unturned; Nigerians have considered this committee as the last symbol of hope on this alleged corrupt act. The success of this task can conveniently be considered as a key milestone which can be instrumental to the redemption of Nigeria’s battered image over this over publicised bribery scandal, and this can score us the point of being good people great nation.
The Halliburton bribery tale has been a worrisome issue since it broke in 2003, following an investigation of KBR, a Halliburton subsidiary, over payments to a range of high profile Nigerian officials in the executive, NNPC and the NLNG. The sum of $180 million was involved over a contract estimated to worth about $6 billion. Kellog, Brown and Root (KBR), the Halliburton subsidiary that got the job, was part of a four-company joint venture on the project. The company has already pleaded guilty and agreed to pay a fine of $520 million.
In the information available in the public domain, court documents in the USA, KBR admitted that at the crucial junctures before the award of the contracts, KBR’s former CEO, Albert Jack Stanley and others met with three successive former holders of a top-level office in the executive branch of the Nigerian government to ask the office holders to designate a representative with whom the joint-venture should negotiate bribes to Nigerian officials. Two representatives were accordingly hired - a consulting company, Tri-Star, based in Gribraltar and a trading company based in Tokyo. Tri-Star was paid $132 million, while the Tokyo Company got $50 million. All the money was to be passed to Nigerian officials, according to documents on the website of the US Justice Department.
The EFCC, which once probed the $180m bribe scandal, interrogated Edmund Daokuru, former minister of state and Funso Kupolokun, the managing director of the NNPC. The scandal broke out after a French court investigated KBR on an allegation that it paid $180m to FG officials to win contracts for the construction of the NLNG plant (an awesome project aimed at building first Africa’s liquefied natural gas plant in Bony, Rivers State, Nigeria). The House of Representatives also carried out a separate investigation. But Halliburton officials failed to cooperate in unveiling the Nigerian officials who shared the $180 million bribe money, on the excuse that investigation on the same match were afoot in the US and Europe. The bribe paid to Nigerian officials was done at different times, starting from the General Sani Abacha years, in 1995.
In 1995, unconfirmed report revealed that Halliburton’s subsidiary, TSKJ, hired Spanish-based Tri-Star Company, owned by indicted London lawyer, Jeffrey Tessler, to pay $60 million in bribes to Nigerians. In 1999, $37.5 million was paid. It was not clear if the money was paid before Abdulsalami handed over to General Obasanjo in May, 1999. But under Obasanjo, Halliburton twice paid kickbacks– in 2001 and 2002. In 2001, $51 million was paid and in 2002, $37.5 million was paid. Two Nigerians whose names had featured in the bribe saga were Alhaji M.D. Yusuf and former oil minister, Dan Etete, during Abacha’s time. Yusuf admitted collecting money from Tessler, but said it was a loan. Etete, on his part, said the NLNG contract was awarded without his input. The contract was valued at more than $6 billion and awarded between 1995 and 2004.
Meanwhile Former President Olusegun Obasanjo an elder statesman was invited to BBC famous programme Hardtalk (sometime in march 2009), anchored by Steven Suckur. In the middle of the interview Steven said Obasanjo’s name was mentioned by Tesler to have been involved in the drama but Obasanjo distanced himself from any wrong doing. Meanwhile, the American investigators made it known that three former Nigerian leaders were indicted in this shoddy deal, and names like Chief Olusegun Obasanjo, Abdusalami Abubakar and late General Sani Abacha are not spared. Also enmeshed in the vast and formalized bribery scheme is a long line of ministers, bureaucrats, top politicians, state and local officials. The question now is who actually collected this bribe? Nigerians are desperate to know. Or could it be a hoax?
However, in April 2009 some sign of relief came when the Federal Government through the Attorney-General/Minister of Justice, Chief Mike Aondoaka disclosed that $150 million out of the $180 million Halliburton bribe is trapped in Zurich, Switzerland. The minister must indeed be commended for this bold step.
His words: “We have discovered that $150million of the bribe money is in Zurich. That is the first shocking discovery. The entire money is $180 million. $150 million is already in Zurich trapped.”
The Attorney-General while addressing press conference said government was trying to find out in whose account the money was lodged. When asked how he got to know that the money was in Zurich, he replied, “Am I not the chief law officer of this country? I went to US and we had useful information. For me even if you are talking to me, sharing ideas with me I must have all the information authenticated by the government and the US government has been very friendly to us.”
On how the government would treat those indicted, he said, “when crime is committed we prosecute and we would not deny prosecution to anybody.” Aondoaka said he was not happy with the way the Halliburton story was being reported as if the government was hiding the names of those involved.
According to him, “the judgment is under seal and you (press) are talking as if we sealed the names in the court so you can’t get the names. “All these names you get, let me make it clear to you, government does not prosecute out of the newspaper stories.
“If somebody said I voted $40 million for you and if the money does not reach you, can I come and prosecute you because in his book he wrote $40 million?
“There must be evidence that must be tendered to show that that money was handed over to you. Is it through wire transfer? Is it through somebody? So these are some of the things we want to establish. The main fact that somebody wrote in his book that I have voted $40 million that he wants to bribe you does not mean that you have taken bribe... For instance, we have discovered that $150 million of the bribe money is in Zurich. That is the first shocking discovery.”
Consequently, Nigerians are happy with the high powered committee set up specifically to thoroughly investigate this matter, and Nigerians have strong conviction that this committee which involves the EFCC boss Hajia Farida Waziri, the Inspector General of Police Mr. Mike Okiro, Attorney-General Chief Mike Aondoaka, others are representatives of the National Security Adviser (NSA), the Director General of the National Intelligence Agency (NIA) and the Director General, States Security Services (SSS). President Umaru Yar'Adua has given assurance that his administration will not shield any Nigerian, no matter his/her status. The President also called for patience from Nigerians on the issue, saying his administration is waiting for the “authentic” facts, as currently sealed by a US Court, so those involved in the scandal would not turn around to accuse the government of political persecution.
Meanwhile all stakeholders concerned in this investigative task should note that there is something crucial here that should not be undermined, and that is the image of Nigeria. Nigerians have read different reports, so many publication online reports from different websites nationally and internationally therefore the committee should ambidextrously expedite its efforts to ensure that no stone is left unturned; Nigerians have considered this committee as the last symbol of hope on this alleged corrupt act. The success of this task can conveniently be considered as a key milestone which can be instrumental to the redemption of Nigeria’s battered image over this over publicised bribery scandal, and this can score us the point of being good people great nation.
Monday, April 27, 2009
Ekiti re-run poll: Which way Nigeria
Ekiti re-run poll: Which way Nigeria?
By Emmanuel Ajibulu
The practise of decent/modern democracy once again has proven to be a mirage in Nigeria, this time around in Ekiti State; the uncontrollable violence where bottles, stones, machetes, etc were allowed to be freely used, over a conduct of a re-run polls by INEC in just 10 LGs (at some selected wards) amidst heavy presence of security operatives (10,000 men) shows the extent of the decay in Nigerian politics; I think The Punch captions it right in its Monday 27th April 2009 publication-Shame of a Nation.
Further, this development has put a lot of news reporters, correspondents, editors, etc in respective media houses into a lot of challenges and scenario of uncertainty, because as news breaks, in the next minute what was considered as news worthy materials or scoop becomes stale within the twinkle of an eye. Today we hear the Resident Electoral Commissioner (REC) is sick and could not continue her work, tomorrow she purportedly resigned and thereafter she reaffirms her appointment as REC in Ekiti and promised to complete what she started. The protest match of half naked women in Ado Ekiti (29th April 2009) is another lesson that cannot be forgotten so easily, as a matter of fact this recent unhealthy happenings can precipitate a great damage to our nascent democracy.
Some have raised highbrow against the immediate past Governor of Lagos State, Asiwaju Bola Tinubu to have been the one throwing weight behind the AC candidate, Dr. Kayode Fayemi. And as speculated by political spectators, that has afforded the latter huge support from the good people of Ekiti. But I asked, what is wrong in that? Good product will always sell itself without advert overkill. Tinubu is a tested and trusted political phenomenon in the history of south-west Nigeria (S/West). He has demonstrated that he is a progressive and his style of governance was the type with human face. Again his political values and virtues underscore that of the late sage, Chief Obafemi Awolowo, his successor, Governor Babatunde Fashola (SAN) has been recording enviable achievements in Lagos. Honestly this is good for the S/west.
Similarly, some have opined that the President, Vice President, Speaker, Governors in PDP controlled states, and other PDP chieftains shouldn’t have come to campaign for the PDP candidate/former Governor of Ekiti State, Engr. Segun Oni, during the electioneering campaign period. There should be no course for alarm, after all Mr. President has proven beyond doubt that he is a symbol of rule of law and transparency, this clout can equally garner support for PDP in the polls. But from an objective angle, we know that the Nigerian President is not a PDP President, Protocol shouldn’t have allowed him to do that.
However, it is immaterial for anyone to show such high volume of support and loyalty to his political party whether at the local, state or federal level. What is important is the ability to conduct election on a levelled playing field so that the most popular contestant can emerge as the winner freely and fairly.
Nigerians can now see for themselves which candidate is popular and from which party, Nigerians can now see who the deceivers are, the traitors, liars etc. If the security of the Resident Electoral Commissioner Mrs. Olushola Adebayo in Ekiti cannot be guaranteed it shows who we are as a country. We must again not lose sleep over the factors that precipitated the woman to initially throw in the towel. There are obviously some forces pressurising her to do some things against the popular demands of the people of Ekiti State.
According to a statement credited to the woman in her purported resignation letter, duly signed by her. ‘’Ekiti State was supposed to be election that will enhance the image of INEC... Unfortunately, the circumstances changed in the middle of the process. Therefore, my conscience as a Christian cannot allow me to further participate in this process.’’
Before the election proper INEC gave the reassurance that it will deploy all necessary resources both human and material to ensure that the April 27 re-run elections would be free and fair, but recent happenings however, have proven that the nation’s election umpire is either incompetent, biased or jittery in the discharge of its legitimate duties.
The time is now when Nigeria should chart a new course for a virile and purposeful future for the present generation and generations unborn. We all need to do which is right at all times and in all places so that posterity can judge us right. Infact Nigeria should tactically desist to call itself the giant of Africa, after its 49 years of independent, other African counties have shown us how elections should be conducted without hitches, Ghana and South Africa are worthy examples.
Moreover, it shows that the slogan Nigeria good people great nation should cease to exist, because we have nothing to celebrate to merit this slogan. The massive irregularities of the Ekiti re-run should be properly managed so that it doesn’t degenerate to another civil unrest. Whoever that is planning an emergency rule in Ekiti this time around should beware and note that it won’t work, Ekiti people cannot be taken for a ride for the second time. Not anymore.
emmanuelajibulu@gmail.com
+2348023660770
By Emmanuel Ajibulu
The practise of decent/modern democracy once again has proven to be a mirage in Nigeria, this time around in Ekiti State; the uncontrollable violence where bottles, stones, machetes, etc were allowed to be freely used, over a conduct of a re-run polls by INEC in just 10 LGs (at some selected wards) amidst heavy presence of security operatives (10,000 men) shows the extent of the decay in Nigerian politics; I think The Punch captions it right in its Monday 27th April 2009 publication-Shame of a Nation.
Further, this development has put a lot of news reporters, correspondents, editors, etc in respective media houses into a lot of challenges and scenario of uncertainty, because as news breaks, in the next minute what was considered as news worthy materials or scoop becomes stale within the twinkle of an eye. Today we hear the Resident Electoral Commissioner (REC) is sick and could not continue her work, tomorrow she purportedly resigned and thereafter she reaffirms her appointment as REC in Ekiti and promised to complete what she started. The protest match of half naked women in Ado Ekiti (29th April 2009) is another lesson that cannot be forgotten so easily, as a matter of fact this recent unhealthy happenings can precipitate a great damage to our nascent democracy.
Some have raised highbrow against the immediate past Governor of Lagos State, Asiwaju Bola Tinubu to have been the one throwing weight behind the AC candidate, Dr. Kayode Fayemi. And as speculated by political spectators, that has afforded the latter huge support from the good people of Ekiti. But I asked, what is wrong in that? Good product will always sell itself without advert overkill. Tinubu is a tested and trusted political phenomenon in the history of south-west Nigeria (S/West). He has demonstrated that he is a progressive and his style of governance was the type with human face. Again his political values and virtues underscore that of the late sage, Chief Obafemi Awolowo, his successor, Governor Babatunde Fashola (SAN) has been recording enviable achievements in Lagos. Honestly this is good for the S/west.
Similarly, some have opined that the President, Vice President, Speaker, Governors in PDP controlled states, and other PDP chieftains shouldn’t have come to campaign for the PDP candidate/former Governor of Ekiti State, Engr. Segun Oni, during the electioneering campaign period. There should be no course for alarm, after all Mr. President has proven beyond doubt that he is a symbol of rule of law and transparency, this clout can equally garner support for PDP in the polls. But from an objective angle, we know that the Nigerian President is not a PDP President, Protocol shouldn’t have allowed him to do that.
However, it is immaterial for anyone to show such high volume of support and loyalty to his political party whether at the local, state or federal level. What is important is the ability to conduct election on a levelled playing field so that the most popular contestant can emerge as the winner freely and fairly.
Nigerians can now see for themselves which candidate is popular and from which party, Nigerians can now see who the deceivers are, the traitors, liars etc. If the security of the Resident Electoral Commissioner Mrs. Olushola Adebayo in Ekiti cannot be guaranteed it shows who we are as a country. We must again not lose sleep over the factors that precipitated the woman to initially throw in the towel. There are obviously some forces pressurising her to do some things against the popular demands of the people of Ekiti State.
According to a statement credited to the woman in her purported resignation letter, duly signed by her. ‘’Ekiti State was supposed to be election that will enhance the image of INEC... Unfortunately, the circumstances changed in the middle of the process. Therefore, my conscience as a Christian cannot allow me to further participate in this process.’’
Before the election proper INEC gave the reassurance that it will deploy all necessary resources both human and material to ensure that the April 27 re-run elections would be free and fair, but recent happenings however, have proven that the nation’s election umpire is either incompetent, biased or jittery in the discharge of its legitimate duties.
The time is now when Nigeria should chart a new course for a virile and purposeful future for the present generation and generations unborn. We all need to do which is right at all times and in all places so that posterity can judge us right. Infact Nigeria should tactically desist to call itself the giant of Africa, after its 49 years of independent, other African counties have shown us how elections should be conducted without hitches, Ghana and South Africa are worthy examples.
Moreover, it shows that the slogan Nigeria good people great nation should cease to exist, because we have nothing to celebrate to merit this slogan. The massive irregularities of the Ekiti re-run should be properly managed so that it doesn’t degenerate to another civil unrest. Whoever that is planning an emergency rule in Ekiti this time around should beware and note that it won’t work, Ekiti people cannot be taken for a ride for the second time. Not anymore.
emmanuelajibulu@gmail.com
+2348023660770
Saturday, March 28, 2009
Nigeria Good People Great Nation- How feasible?
Nigeria Good people Great Nation, how feasible?
Laudable as the initiative may seem to be as orchestrated by its advocates, with the generic essence of showcasing Nigeria to the world as a country worth partnering with in every facets of life devoid of nefarious tendencies.
Thumb up should be given to Prof. Dora Akunyuli in respect of her meritorious achievements as the former NAFDAC DG and currently the county’s Minister of Information and Communication who is on another rescue mission to redeeming Nigeria’s battered image. Indeed her good work should be commended and appreciated.
However, one thing should be considered in the principle of brand management which is the unique selling point. What can we describe as Nigeria’s unique selling point as a global brand before they come about this initiative? For example there is a product which calls its unique selling point what a soothing relief, and truly having used that particular product relief often comes to the consumer of the product, another says nothing refreshes like...and truly if one drinks it, it puts an end to thirst. Looking beyond products, India describes itself as Incredible India and that can be tied to Tourism and IT. Truly Asia when such sound comes to ear the impression that gives suggests that Malaysia who is the proponent of that pay off line (Truly Asia) is likely to be the root for all Asian States.
In this wider scholarly reasoning, Nigeria is considered as a product or brand expected to enjoy widespread patronage across the globe, but the question is, on what basis will Nigeria tie its rebranding? Will it be on investment, security, tourism, corruption-free-state, virile democratic principles, rule of law, infrastructure development among other things?
We have seen a lot of governors (some who are still serving and some out of office) accused of different corrupt practices at the expense of the people they serve(d) in their respective states. We have heard of ministers in key ministries, Chairmen of Boards, MDs, DGs etc, whose hands have also been soiled with allegations of money laundering and financial misappropriation. Meanwhile these issues are yet to be completely resolved by the anti graft agents in the country. These high profile corruptions are part of the factors bedevilling the progress of the country and dragging the name to the mud among comity of nations and keeping away the name of the country from being great or good.
Recently the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office advised it nationals that reside in the Niger/Delta to leave immediately affirming that the region is no longer safe for them to live.
According to a statement credited to them: "We advise against all travelling to the Niger Delta States of Bayelsa, Delta and Rivers (including Port Harcourt) and advise British nationals in these States to leave. This is because of the very high risk of kidnapping, armed robbery and other armed attacks in these areas". Akwa Ibom State, Bauchi State, and Plateau State were also listed as danger zones. This apparently does not portray our image well as a nation, and what that brings to mind is that there is no safety in Nigeria even if we intend to tie our unique selling point to tourism or safety this will definitely not attract tourist or even investors to our country.
The last elections conducted in Nigeria was described to have been marred with a lot of malpractices with attendant court cases challenging the victory of some elected public officials, and re-run election in some instances, and the sack of few from offices. This incessant ordeal really projects Nigeria as a country that lacks the ability to conduct free and fair election, country that has lost its value system and integrity. The ripple effect of that is that no investor can show any serious commitment in such environment where there is no guarantee for stability in government.
Moreover, we should not shy away from the fact that no nation can be said to be great if the enabling environment cannot cater for good health, good infrastructure, gainful employment, security of lives and properties, sincerity of purpose by every players in all sectors to mention but a few.
For this campaign to have driven well its intention as promulgated by the federal government of Nigeria, the government of the day should first of all embarked on a re-orientation programme across board, (in the ministries/parastatals/agencies, Schools, among artisans and elites, police, military, customs, immigration, SSS, in the sports circle, in the LG, States and at the Federal level etc) so that an average Nigeria can take ownership of this virile and veritable initiative, until then we are likely not to make any head way to truly reposition Nigeria amongst the leading economies of the world as Good People Great Nation.
By Emmanuel Ajibulu
Laudable as the initiative may seem to be as orchestrated by its advocates, with the generic essence of showcasing Nigeria to the world as a country worth partnering with in every facets of life devoid of nefarious tendencies.
Thumb up should be given to Prof. Dora Akunyuli in respect of her meritorious achievements as the former NAFDAC DG and currently the county’s Minister of Information and Communication who is on another rescue mission to redeeming Nigeria’s battered image. Indeed her good work should be commended and appreciated.
However, one thing should be considered in the principle of brand management which is the unique selling point. What can we describe as Nigeria’s unique selling point as a global brand before they come about this initiative? For example there is a product which calls its unique selling point what a soothing relief, and truly having used that particular product relief often comes to the consumer of the product, another says nothing refreshes like...and truly if one drinks it, it puts an end to thirst. Looking beyond products, India describes itself as Incredible India and that can be tied to Tourism and IT. Truly Asia when such sound comes to ear the impression that gives suggests that Malaysia who is the proponent of that pay off line (Truly Asia) is likely to be the root for all Asian States.
In this wider scholarly reasoning, Nigeria is considered as a product or brand expected to enjoy widespread patronage across the globe, but the question is, on what basis will Nigeria tie its rebranding? Will it be on investment, security, tourism, corruption-free-state, virile democratic principles, rule of law, infrastructure development among other things?
We have seen a lot of governors (some who are still serving and some out of office) accused of different corrupt practices at the expense of the people they serve(d) in their respective states. We have heard of ministers in key ministries, Chairmen of Boards, MDs, DGs etc, whose hands have also been soiled with allegations of money laundering and financial misappropriation. Meanwhile these issues are yet to be completely resolved by the anti graft agents in the country. These high profile corruptions are part of the factors bedevilling the progress of the country and dragging the name to the mud among comity of nations and keeping away the name of the country from being great or good.
Recently the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office advised it nationals that reside in the Niger/Delta to leave immediately affirming that the region is no longer safe for them to live.
According to a statement credited to them: "We advise against all travelling to the Niger Delta States of Bayelsa, Delta and Rivers (including Port Harcourt) and advise British nationals in these States to leave. This is because of the very high risk of kidnapping, armed robbery and other armed attacks in these areas". Akwa Ibom State, Bauchi State, and Plateau State were also listed as danger zones. This apparently does not portray our image well as a nation, and what that brings to mind is that there is no safety in Nigeria even if we intend to tie our unique selling point to tourism or safety this will definitely not attract tourist or even investors to our country.
The last elections conducted in Nigeria was described to have been marred with a lot of malpractices with attendant court cases challenging the victory of some elected public officials, and re-run election in some instances, and the sack of few from offices. This incessant ordeal really projects Nigeria as a country that lacks the ability to conduct free and fair election, country that has lost its value system and integrity. The ripple effect of that is that no investor can show any serious commitment in such environment where there is no guarantee for stability in government.
Moreover, we should not shy away from the fact that no nation can be said to be great if the enabling environment cannot cater for good health, good infrastructure, gainful employment, security of lives and properties, sincerity of purpose by every players in all sectors to mention but a few.
For this campaign to have driven well its intention as promulgated by the federal government of Nigeria, the government of the day should first of all embarked on a re-orientation programme across board, (in the ministries/parastatals/agencies, Schools, among artisans and elites, police, military, customs, immigration, SSS, in the sports circle, in the LG, States and at the Federal level etc) so that an average Nigeria can take ownership of this virile and veritable initiative, until then we are likely not to make any head way to truly reposition Nigeria amongst the leading economies of the world as Good People Great Nation.
By Emmanuel Ajibulu
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
